logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.05.29 2014나105699
구상금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) No. 1, 2, and 4 of the evidence No. 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance (“303.91m”; (b) No. 300m each “280m”; and (c) No. 303.91m each “No. 13m” under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, for the reasons for the court's explanation of this case: (a) No. 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance (“3, No. 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance”; and (b) No. 303.91m each “No. 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance”; and (c) No. 5, No. 412 of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance.

Furthermore, the Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant’s failure to install a traffic protection fence on the instant road is a defect in the installation and preservation of the instant road. As such, it is acknowledged that the instant road is a scambru, and there are street trees and rock walls, etc. 280 meters in parallel to the right side of the road, and there is no street protection fence installed on the road. In full view of the purport of the oral argument in the statement in the evidence No. 17, the “vehicle Safety and Management Guidelines” in the “Road Safety Facilities Regulation” prescribed in the “Road Safety Facilities Regulation” provides that the section deemed particularly necessary on the road where the scam and scambs are protruding from the scam and scambru on the road where the upper part is less than 300 meters in consideration of the front part of the road and the front part of the scambru on the road where the upper part is less than 300 meters in consideration of the front part of the road.”

However, the following circumstances recognized by the aforementioned evidence, i.e., (i) the Guideline prevents a vehicle that deviates from the normal course of driving along the road, from departing from the road, road, sidewalk, etc., and at the same time, damages passengers and damages the vehicle.

arrow