A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office No. 3912, which was seized, No. 1, 2018.

Punishment of the crime

【Name-based Telecommunications Fraud Organization’s total responsibility of Non-Public Offering 【Name-based Telecommunications Fraud Organization’s Office was prepared in the Philippines and China. A number of call center employees was recruited to provide education on how to commit telephone financial fraud, and then planned to receive money by calling phone to many and unspecified domestic unspecified persons, and misrepresenting the public prosecutor, investigator, etc., and the Defendant met the above-mentioned general responsibility in China, and sees that “When success in telephone financial fraud, 3-5% of the successful amount will be given.”

The full responsibility of name in the name is to manage the call center office, the withdrawal book, and the collection book of passbook, and the 'the former' is to provide the business funds, and the intermediary management books in the name are to manage the employees of call center, including the defendant (the defendant was recruited by recruiting the staff of call center), and in accordance with the direction of the general responsibility, he assumes a false representation of the investigative agency in Korea, and defrauds the money, and take charge of fraud, fraud, remittance, and delivery in Korea.

【Specific Crime】

1. On April 12, 2018, at the call center office located in China around 10:40 on April 12, 2018, the Defendant, along with the nameless call center employees, called the victim C, called the victim C and called the victim C to “D investigators in Seoul.”

C. In Gwangju, the head of C C is found that the fraud was arrested;

At present C, as C is a suspect, in order to prove the fact that C is a victim, 10,000 won shall be remitted.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

그러나 사실 피고인을 비롯한 전화금융 사기 조직원들은 검사와 수사관을 사칭하여 피해 자로부터 금원을 받아 가로챌 생각이었다.

The defendant, in collusion with another assistance officer, such as his name or an unsound telephone finance fraud organization, shall induce the victim to do so.