Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than two months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are members of the Chinese telephone finance fraud organization. One person J and one person K have decided to act as a leader of the call center and to have the victims pay money to the call account by misrepresenting himself/herself as a counselor of the call center and to have the victims pay money to the call account. The chief of the shipbuilding unit NJ has decided to act as a manager of each call center management entity of L, M, AB, and N, and P, R, etc. as an intermediate manager, and T, U, V, W, X, X, andY, and to act as a counselor of the call center and to have the victims pay money to the call account.

The Defendants, in collusion with T and other Chinese telephone financial fraud assistance staff, in an influent office located in the city of Yongsan in China around 10:00 on May 16, 2017, the Defendants called the victim BL and called the Seoul Central District Office FX investigator, and FY prosecutor.

A personal account was used for a crime.

Case number is 2017-5027, and the principal offender is O for the staff of Han Bank.

It is necessary to prove that there is no crime-related relationship because damage has occurred to 50 million won due to the current account.

The phrase “the remittance of money deposited in a bank will be confirmed as a crime relation and returned,” and the employee in non-name deceivings the victim by sending the official text “the case No. 5027 of the Seoul Central Inspection Office” by the victim’s e-mail, and then, in around 13:18 of the same day, 35 million won in the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the FZ (Account Number GA), 30 million won in the Saemaul Bank Account (Account Number GC) in the name of GB around 15:08 on the same day, 16:00 on the same day, and 16:00 on the same day, 6.2 million won in the name of GD account (Account Number GE), 6.175,007,707,707,707, and 7.07,000 won in the aggregate by taking the victim’s account in the name of GD (GaF) account in the name of GB around 16:04 on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements.