All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the court below (the imprisonment of six months, confiscation, additional collection of 2,700,000 won) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The judgment act of arranging sexual traffic is detrimental to the sound sexual culture and good morals of women by commercializing their sex, which has a great social hazard and has committed the crime of this case during the period of suspension of execution due to the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving of Drinking). Although there was no previous conviction of the same kind, the defendant, although he did not have the same criminal record, committed the crime of this case under paragraph (2) of the same decision in the judgment of the court below, since he did not have been under the control by the police during the period of suspension of execution, he committed the crime under paragraph (1) of the same kind. However, it is more favorable for the defendant to recognize and reflect his mistake, and the fact that the actual profit

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the developments leading up to the instant crime, circumstances after the instant crime, Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., as well as the scope of recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines set by the Supreme Court sentencing committee, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or inappropriate, and thus, the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s assertion are without merit.

3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.