A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, as the owner of "C" on the second floor of Suwon-si B building in Suwon-si B, from March 17, 2017, the same year.

4. By July 4, 200; and

6. The same year from around 19.

6. Until December 22, 200, male customers who found the above business place received 120,000 won as the price for sexual traffic from the male customers, and provided guidance to D (V, Vietnam, and age 28) who are women of sexual traffic to have sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police officer against the defendant or E;

1. Each statement prepared by the defendant, F, G, H, I, and E;

1. Application of statutes on field control photographs, copies of a contract for transfer of business, and photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act and selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order [Referral, etc. for sexual traffic] and the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act : (a) the basic area ( June - one year and April 201) is regulating the business of arranging sexual traffic on April 7, 2017; and (b) the Defendant was under prosecution on April 26, 2017, but again arranged sexual traffic at the same place on June 2017.

The nature and circumstances of the crime are very bad, and the risk of recidivism is significant in that the defendant does not have punishment but has committed an intentional act in violation of the law and order repeatedly.

I would like to say.

In this context, the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the conditions of sentencing, such as the confession and reflection of the defendant's crime, and the first offender who has no record of punishment.