All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant C1) misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles, Defendant C was merely an employee of the instant sexual traffic business establishment from April 15, 2014 to August 31, 2014, and the frequency of mediation was less than the estimated value of the investigation agency, but the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts of calculating the surcharge in excess of the profit gained from the act of arranging sexual traffic, or by misapprehending the legal principles. (2) The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one year of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant A’s punishment of the lower court (a fine of three million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. As to the assertion of mistake or misapprehension of legal principles, the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court: (i) Defendant C received 140,000 to 150,000 won per time from the prosecution; (ii) Defendant C independently committed the instant arrangement from September 1, 2014 to June 24, 2015; (iii) Defendant C conspired with the investigative agency for a total of 04 times from September 1, 2014 to October 30, 2014 to October 30, 2014 to 10, 300 to 10,000 won per time; (iv) Defendant C acquired the instant arrangement of commercial sex acts in collusion with Defendant C during the period of 10,031, 150 to June 24, 2014 to 30, 2014 to 10, 30,014 to 30,614, respectively.