The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant committed an act against the police officer from the control of child pornography, which seems to injure himself/herself by committing an excessive act, which is a deadly weapon, and such act constitutes intimidation, which is the element of the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, as a notice of harm and injury that may cause a police officer to feel that “the Defendant may injure himself/herself and die, and may display a deadly weapon to the police officer,” and thus constitutes intimidation, which is the element of the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties. However, the lower court acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged in this case, and erred by misapprehending

2. Determination

A. As to the facts charged in this case, the lower court determined that the Defendant stated, ① “I think that I will die in knife. I think I would no longer do if I think I would do so. I would not do so. I would not do so, and ② I would like to bring knife and knife as in the facts charged, or would do anything to knife or kill police officers before and after knife the knife or knife the knife. I would not do so; ③ Police Officers who entered the knife to regulate Defendant’s knife and knife the knife and knife the knife, etc., were not able to knife our knife our knife or knife our knife our knife, but I would like to knife our knife our knife it.”