beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, respectively.
Seized evidence 1, 2, 4, 5, 17, 80, .
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Power】
1. Defendant A was sentenced to two years and two months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court on February 19, 2014, and on May 21, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul East District Court on May 21, 2015, and completed the execution of each of the above punishment at the Seongdong-gu District Court on May 21, 2015.
2. Defendant B was sentenced to five months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Northern District Court on January 16, 2015, and was released on May 22, 2015 during the execution of the sentence in Seongdong-gu District Court on parole on June 14, 2015.
【Criminal Facts】
1. The Defendants made a false statement that “to arrange a high-amount loan by raising credit level” to the persons in need of the loan, and conspired to purchase a vehicle in the name of the lending requester by obtaining a certificate of personal seal impression, identification card, credit card, etc. from the lending requester, and to gain profits equivalent to the loan amount.
around January 2016, the Defendants met the victim E in the mutual infinial finite of “finite tree” near Songpa-gu Seoul Songpa-gu Office, and Defendant A loaned KRW 4-500 million to the victim as Defendant “I have a large number of employees working in the bank in the surrounding area, and the card company employees are also aware of the credit rating. After purchasing and selling a vehicle with a credit card, it is possible to lend a loan by getting credit rating up to the first month when the full amount of the payment to be paid. The personal seal impression, passbook, authorized certificate, resident registration certificate, etc. are necessary for the purchase and lending of the vehicle.” Defendant B introduced that “A is a person who works on the opposite side of the card company, and process the purchase of the vehicle register.” Defendant B carried out a loan-related business in the financial rights as introduced by Defendant A.
However, the facts were that Defendant B did not work for the card company, and the Defendants are in friendly with the Bank and the card company employees.