Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a business trip, a page, and a general restaurant in the mail order of B.

A person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall not place a false mark of the place of origin or place a mark likely to cause confusion therewith, or prepare, sell or provide such products in disguised manner of the place of origin.

On May 18, 2017, the Defendant purchased an amount equivalent to KRW 1,348,508 from D E located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, the amount of 198.31kg, 1,348,508, when selling food for cooking business trip, such as LAC, at a business establishment operated by the Defendant of Namyang-si.

From May 19, 2017 to May 20, 2017, the Defendant sold an amount equivalent to KRW 60 km, 2,200,000, a total of KRW 2,000, a total of 30 km , 20,000, which was prepared to kill the Republic of Korea on a written estimate, by putting up a separate notice of the selling prices of domestic and foreign products on the corresponding product on the Internet homepage, and inserting the country of origin to the consumers ordering the Republic of Korea.

Accordingly, the Defendant sold the country of origin of the U.S. swine with false labeling or disguised origin.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A copy of the report on detection, confirmation, on-site evidence photograph, each investigation report (Attachment of the detailed statement of purchase of SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS S SPS SPS SPS S SPS SPS SPS SPS SPSS S

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about criminal records and investigation records;

1. Article 15 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Articles 6(2)1 (a) and 6(2)3 of the former Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products (amended by Act No. 14291, Dec. 2, 2016; hereinafter the same) on criminal facts and on the written indictment under Article 6(2)3 of the former Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products (amended by Act No. 14291, Dec. 2, 2016; hereinafter the same) are apparent that “No. 2” is a clerical error, and thus, the defendant’s right to defend.