beta
Text
1. As to the Plaintiff on the ground of sale on May 19, 2012:
A. Defendant B, C, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M.
Reasons
Basic Facts
The Plaintiff is a housing reconstruction association established under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) for the purpose of promoting a reconstruction project on housing of 14,416.78 square meters in Mapo-gu Seoul, including each real estate listed in the attached Table 1’s list (hereinafter “instant real estate” according to the title thereof, and completed the establishment registration on March 16, 2010 with the approval of establishment from the head of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office on March 12, 2010.
The remaining Defendants except Defendant N andO (hereinafter “owner Defendants”) possess each of the instant real estate in the project district and each of the instant real estate, such as the Plaintiff’s members who agreed to the reconstruction of the instant case and the entry in the “owned real estate” column of the detailed statement of the execution of the sales contract in the attached Table 2.
In other words, Defendant B occupies each of the above real estate as the owners of the 1, 2, 3, 4 of this case, 8 of this case, 9 of this case, 19, 20 of this case, 19, 23 of this case, 25 of Defendant C of this case, 3 of this case, and 25 of this case.
Meanwhile, Defendant D actually occupies three floors of the instant real estate as the owner of shares 36.48 percent of the instant 5 real estate, shares 4.42 percent of the instant 6 real estate, and shares 92.67 percent of the instant 7 real estate. Defendant G, H, and I occupy three floors of the instant 7 real estate. Defendant G, H, and I occupy the instant real estate as the owner of shares 28.15 percent of each of the instant 10 real estate, and shares 52.02 percent of each of the instant 11 through 18, as the owner of each of the instant 11 percent of 231 percent of the 10 real estate, and the Defendant G actually occupied the instant real estate as the owner of each of the instant 11 percent of the 10 real estate, and the instant 12 percent of the 13 real estate as the owner of each of the instant 42.02 shares.
In addition, Defendant K will be able to do so.