logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.01.28 2011가합18343
소유권이전등기 등
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B received KRW 2,710,933,490 from the Plaintiff and simultaneously received KRW 2,710,93,490 from the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a housing reconstruction association established under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) for the purpose of promoting housing reconstruction projects for apartment and commercial buildings in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, including each real estate listed in the attached list (hereinafter “attached real estate”), and completed the establishment registration on July 27, 201 after obtaining authorization from the head of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office for the establishment of the association on August 3, 201.

B. At the time of October 20, 201, the filing date of the instant lawsuit, Defendant B, as of October 20, 201, owned the following real estate; Defendant C, each of the real estate in attached Forms 1 and 2; Defendant D, each of the real estate in attached Forms 3 and 4; Defendant E, each of the real estate in attached Forms 7 and 5 and 6; Defendant F, each of the real estate in attached Forms 9 and 10; Defendant G, each of the real estate in attached Forms 11 and 12; Defendant H, each of the real estate in attached Forms 13 and 14; Defendant H, each of the real estate in attached Forms 13 and 14; Defendant I, J, K, L, and N, each of the real estate in attached Forms 15 through 20; Defendant M owned the real estate in attached Forms 21 through 26; and the aforementioned Defendants did not join all of the Plaintiff’s members.

C. On September 15, 2011, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendants a brief statement of the consent to the establishment of an association with the title "an guide (the peremptory notice to the consent to the establishment of an association)", and on October 20, 2011, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit and notified the Defendants to answer whether to participate in reconstruction pursuant to Article 39 of the Urban Improvement Act and Article 48 of the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (hereinafter "the Aggregate Buildings Act") and expressed their intent to exercise the right to demand sale unless they reply within two months after receiving the notice attached to the written consent.

The duplicate of the instant complaint to Defendant B, C, E, and F on November 14, 201, to Defendant D, G, and H on November 15, 201, to Defendant J, L, and N on July 18, 201, to Defendant J, L, and N on July 18, 201, to Defendant I, M on July 19, 201, and to Defendant K on July 23, 201.

arrow