logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.06.22 2017가단21710
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 5,700,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from October 1, 2016 to June 22, 2016.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 1, 2016, the Plaintiff and the Defendant, along with four members of the Internet alpine club “C” (hereinafter “instant mountain club”), were the Plaintiff’s face as head of the Defendant, by misunderstanding that the Plaintiff had sexual intercourse with the female members of the instant mountain club (the female members were inappropriate for the Defendant).

B. As a result, the Plaintiff sustained injury to face, crypology and crypology in need of two weeks of treatment, the left-hand side of the music requiring four weeks of treatment, and the right-hand part of the right-hand part.

C. On April 3, 2017, the Defendant issued and finalized a summary order of KRW 3,00,000 for the crime of injury in the Jeonju District Court Decision 2016 High Court Decision 9003, supra.

The plaintiff was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 on the violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 4 evidence, Eul 2 and 3 evidence, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the claim on the principal lawsuit

A. According to the facts of the recognition above, the defendant suffered from injury to the plaintiff and suffered from injury, such as a flag, which requires four weeks' medical treatment. Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate for the plaintiff's damage.

B. Compensation range 1) Medical expenses: 5,000,000 won (the plaintiff claimed 1,000,000,000 won for the charnel medical expenses for the remaining aggregate after the outbreak, but there is no evidence to support that the plaintiff needs to transplant in the future, this part is without merit.

[Reasons for Recognition] The amount determined by Gap evidence 2 and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of consolation money 2: 700,000 won: circumstances leading to this case, the degree of injury of the plaintiff, and all the circumstances revealed in the arguments.

arrow