logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.08.14 2013고정2796
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 80,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 03:45 on June 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) directed the victim C (the 21 years of age) who was working on the part of the Defendant on the alleyway located in Macheon-si, Macheon-si, Macheon-si, 220-1, and expressed the victim’s desire “I am and I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am am I am I am I am I am.” on the ground that the victim expressed “I am I am??” on the part of the victim’s claim, I am am I am I am I am I am I am am am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the respective legal statements of witnesses C and D to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. On June 23, 2013, at around 03:45, the Defendant: (a) directed the victim C (Woo, age 21) who was going on the way of the Defendant’s daily operation on the alley 220-1 located in Macheon-si, Macheon-do; (b) stated that “This chronia, flusium, flusium, and flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium; (c) on the ground that the victim flusium flusium, the victim flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flus the victim’s head.

2. The victim’s investigative agency and the victim’s statement and the injury diagnosis statement as shown in the facts charged of the instant case may be admitted as evidence. However, according to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it cannot be said that the victim’s assault, such as the Defendant’s statement of facts constituting the crime, has proved to the extent that it is beyond a reasonable doubt that there was a sacriffy for about four weeks of treatment due to the victim’s assault.

arrow