1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The following facts may be acknowledged either as a dispute between the parties or as a whole by taking account of the descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 2, Gap evidence Nos. 5 and 8 and the purport of the entire pleadings:

The plaintiff is the operator of the D-si vehicle in the M-si in the M-si in the M-si in the M-si.

B. On December 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was aboard the taxi driven by the Plaintiff, and became an operational problem, and was assaulted by the Plaintiff, leading the Plaintiff while disputing the Plaintiff.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Defendant assaulted the Plaintiff by taking advantage of the Plaintiff’s inner part, salone, etc., and thereby, the Plaintiff suffered bodily injury, such as the escape from the right-hand side of the Plaintiff, the 1, 2, 2, and 2, from the right-hand side of the Plaintiff.

As a result, the Plaintiff spent 2,00,000 won for medical treatment in the future, and 13,850,000 won for medical treatment in the future. The Plaintiff lost 0.684% labor capacity and suffered damages of 1,404,581 won for lost income (1,58,031 won for monthly income x 0.684% for labor capacity x 0.684% for monthly heading-type 131.7998 for the operating period x 176 months). As such, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages, including 5,000,000 won for damages caused by the above tort (22,261,581,404,581 won for daily income , 2,007,000 won for future medical treatment expenses, 13,50,000 won for future medical treatment expenses, 50,000 won for delay damages).

B. According to the records of Gap evidence No. 1, it is recognized that the plaintiff was diagnosed on December 20, 2017 that the plaintiff suffered from the injury of about 29 days due to the injury, such as serious dynamics and sacrificings caused by the escape of the shoulder on the right side at the E Hospital, training response to the sacrifies, the first and second sacrificings on the left side of the sacrife, etc.

However, each of the above evidence and the fact-finding conducted by the court of first instance to the head of Seoul Regional Headquarters of the National Health Insurance Corporation shall be considered as follows.