1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's claims extended by this court are dismissed.

3...

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. A. Around October 19, 2016, the Defendant, on the ground that: (a) around October 19, 2016, the Defendant suffered injury for the Plaintiff to require approximately two weeks of medical treatment on the ground that the Plaintiff, on the ground that: (a) the Plaintiff was her own child, “I will return late at night; (b) I will return to the female; and (c) I will both beenoyed.”

(hereinafter “the instant assault”). 【The ground for recognition” is without dispute, entry of evidence No. 1, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

B. The Defendant shall compensate the Plaintiff for damages caused by the instant assault.

2. Scope of liability for damages

(a) Active damage: 97,700 won (i.e., 67,700 won 30,000 won) - Medical expenses: 67,700 won (Evidence A 3) - Expenses for the replacement of an internal police officer: 30,000 won (Evidence A 4);

(b) Consolation money: 300,000 won - Determination by taking into account the developments of the instant assault and the degree of damage suffered by the Plaintiff

다. 원고의 장래 치료비 지급청구에 대한 판단 1) 주장 원고가 이 사건 폭행으로 상악 좌측 측절치와 상악 좌측 견치에 아탈구{치아에 외상이 가해져 발생하는 손상의 일종으로 변위(變位)를 수반하지는 않지만 약간의 동요(動搖)를 보임)라는 상해를 입었고, 이를 치료하는 데 필요한 비용을 현가로 계산한 금액은 4,088,000원이다. 따라서 피고는 원고에게 위 금액을 손해배상으로 지급할 의무가 있다. 2) 판단 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들을 통하여 알 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정들에 비추어 보면, 갑 제6호증의 기재만으로는 원고가 이 사건 폭행 때문에 상악 좌측 측절치와 상악 좌측 견치에 아탈구를 입었다는 사실을 인정하기에 부족하고, 달리 증거가 없다.

Therefore, we cannot accept this part of the plaintiff's assertion.

A. On October 19, 2016, after the instant assault, C Hospital Doctor D diagnosed and prepared by the Plaintiff on October 19, 2016, “the Plaintiff suffered an open room for the part of the unknown description of the oral and oral surgery.”