1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff falling under the following part ordering payment against Defendant F.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 201, Co-Defendant D of the first instance trial (hereinafter “D”) received a proposal from a person who is the head of the I office to use the “H real estate brokerage office” located in G in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, for the purpose of the loan of workers’ full-time loan, to grant the lessor the false house lease contract, and accepted the proposal.

B. D suggested that the co-defendant E of the first instance trial (hereinafter “E”) will pay the lessor the false housing lease contract to be used for the purpose of the employee deposit loan loan.

E suggested that the first instance co-defendant B (hereinafter referred to as "B") may lend the name of the lessor of a false housing lease contract to be used for obtaining a worker's entire loan loan in accordance with the above proposal.

B, according to the proposal of E, the first floor No. 101 (hereinafter referred to as “instant housing”) of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government L 101 (hereinafter referred to as “instant housing”) was provided as the leased object of a false rental agreement.

C. At the H real estate office operated by Defendant F, the lessor and the first instance co-defendant A (hereinafter “A”) were the lessee at the H real estate office as well as the Defendant F’s H real estate office, and the Plaintiff entered as the broker of Defendant FF and entered into a false lease agreement to lease the instant housing amounting to KRW 70 million.

On August 5, 2011, the head of the above I, along with A, applied for a loan of 49 million won to employees in charge of loan from the bank at the new branch of Han Bank, Han Bank, Dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, for a loan of 49 million won to employees in charge of loan from the bank. The head of the I submitted relevant documents, such as the aforementioned false lease contract, and acquired the loan of 49 million won from the account in the name of the defendant C.

(hereinafter “instant crime”). E.

On the other hand, on August 5, 201, the Plaintiff’s deposit amounting to KRW 44,100,000 and the guarantee period on August 2013, 201 with respect to a lease loan to a single bank borne by A as above.