logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.02 2017고정280
모욕
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a member of the Berne Storage Center in the daily activity of the defendant as the "B".

On March 14, 2016, around 16:59, the Defendant: (a) called “D” at the office of the Defendant of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 34 floor under the title of “D” at the beb-day bulletin board of the Internet site on the Internet website; and (b) on the photograph of the Victim F, which was placed on the magazine as a marking model, “Seeeeeein”

The author made up and posted comments on the “full Oral Peman”, thereby openly insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of the police statement made to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) reflects the Defendant’s mistake, which is the first offender who has no record of criminal punishment, and 350 comments on the Internet as indicated in its reasoning). Among them, the Defendant written comments on the comments as indicated in its reasoning once and takes into account the circumstances, contents, etc

arrow