The defendant is innocent.

1. On May 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) visited the Defendant’s personal phone phone with the Defendant’s Internet website, and (b) had an interview with the victim C (VI) who had sexual assaulted in Korea; and (c) had an interview with the victim D (VI) who talked about the issues of Korean sex offense; and (d) had an interview with the victim D (VI) who talked about the issues of Korean sex offense.

2. The offense of insult is established by expressing a sacrific sentiment that may undermine the social evaluation of a particular person or an organization possessing character. Therefore, the victim should be specified. The object of insult in the comments written by the defendant is "one woman (a woman's ascendant or descendant using Korean women)", and the victim stated in the facts charged cannot be deemed as the victim, and the "Korean woman" cannot be deemed as a specific person or an organization possessing character. Thus, the defendant's act of writing and printing the above comments cannot be deemed as a crime of insult.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in the instant case are not a crime, and thus, the facts charged in the instant case shall be acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.