beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Special intimidation: (a) on September 26, 2017, the Defendant: (b) around 08:10 on September 26, 2017, the Defendant: (c) 08:10 on the street before the D Elementary School located in Gwangju-si, worn a glass license without any justifiable reason; and (d) took a wooden gall (1m, diameter 6cm) which is an object dangerous to the hack; (b) the Defendant, a green mother of the above elementary school, who had engaged in traffic safety campaigns in the above street, thought that the Defendant’s appearance “if I wish to go to the h, and the gras are citing the gras, it may be a threat to the hin.
Due to school routes, the phrase “Isday to another place” is defective, and the victim “Isday to go on the part of the victim;
b. Rotten Mestoves
“The victim was threatened by several times as the victim was satisfed with the wood mon, which was a dangerous object cited in the word “.”
2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of special official duties at the time and place indicated in paragraph 1, as seen above, threatened the above E with a tree monet, which is a dangerous object as described in paragraph 1, at the same time and place. At the same time, G police officers affiliated with the G police box of the Gwangju Police Station, which carried out a traffic safety campaign at the above place, listened to the Defendant’s statement of damage from the above E, and dembling the above G with the view to “I am feasia to ask the Defendant about the circumstances of the instant case.” The above G am mon, which was a dangerous object cited by the Defendant “I amfasia fasia fasia fasia fasia fasia fasia fasia fasia fasia fass the instant G, and fledd the part and part of the said G’s bridge to the Defendant, and spit it, etc. in order to arrest a flagrant offender under suspicion of special intimidation and interference with the performance of official duties.
Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and interfered with the maintenance of social order of police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders.