logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019. 11. 28. 선고 2019두49816 판결
(심리불속행)공부상 주택이 아닌 오피스텔을 주택으로 볼 수 있는지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Suwon High Court-2019-Nu-10401 ( October 17, 2019)

Title

(Psychologic. 1) Whether an officetel other than a public injury house can be viewed as a house

Summary

If an officetel is not a house on the public register, but a residential officetel for the purpose of residence is confirmed, it is necessary to determine non-taxation as a house regardless of the purpose of public register.

Related statutes

Articles 88 and 89 of the Income Tax Act

Cases

2019-Du-49816 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

AA

Defendant-Appellee

oo Tax Director

The second instance decision

Suwon High Court Decision 2019Nu10401 Decided July 17, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

November 28, 2019

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the allegation in the grounds of appeal by appellant is not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow