A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On July 3, 2015, at around 20:10, the Defendant, at the restaurant of “D” operated by “D” in Gwangju City, sent the phrase “D,” and obstructed meals to the customers who had received meals at the relevant place, and received 112 reports, the Defendant left twice the back of the head of the said F in his hand by a police officer F of the Gwangju Police Station, who was called “D” and was urged to return home from F of the police officer of the Gwangju Police Station.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to F and G;

1. Investigation report (probed statement);

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, including the fact that the defendant is against the defendant and appears to be a crime due to depression, and that

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act concerning orders to provide community service and attend lectures;