beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for nine months.
Of the facts charged in the instant case, the fraud related to the clothing industry and February 3, 2009.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2016 Highest 987"
1. On October 3, 2013, the Defendant, under the name of the horse center deposit, received KRW 10 million from the victim to the Defendant’s Saemaul Bank account in Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu (Seoul Mapo-gu) on the following grounds: (a) although the victim did not have the intent or ability to allow the victim to engage in the horse center’s business, the Defendant, “If the horse is run in the country, it may be deemed the Center; (b) would help the horse to connect the horse with the center and buy the right; (c) in the industry of this day, he would be called “rawing”; (d) in rolling, he may be punished for rolling expenses; and (e) should be included in the Center; and (e) from that time, he/she received KRW 10 million from the victim to the Defendant’s Saemaul Bank account from that time to March 18, 2014; and (e) acquired the victim’s total sum of KRW 657 million from that time to March 18, 2014.
2. Around December 18, 2013, the loan money fraud: (a) as if the facts at the above restaurant do not have any special property and, even if the money was borrowed from the damaged party, it would be possible to repay the money; (b) and (c) as if the money was remitted from the damaged party to April 9, 2014; and (c) received a total of KRW 20,70,000 from the Si to April 9, 2014 as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table (3).
The Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime at the Seoul Western District Court on December 28, 2005, and the Seoul Southern District Court released on November 30, 2006 during the execution of the above punishment on parole on December 27, 2006.
[Criminal facts] The Defendant, on May 19, 2009, phone called to the victim G and repaid “7 million won in addition to the money borrowed prior to the loan.”
“.........”
However, in fact, the defendant thought that he did not have any other property or income as a bad credit, and was used as a loan of money from the injured party.