Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Chungcheong District Court on May 23, 2002, and was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for the same crime on November 18, 2005 in the support of the Daejeon District Court on the 190s, and was sentenced to four times more. Defendant B was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for larceny, etc. from the Chungcheong Branch of the Chungcheongnam District Court on January 11, 2005, and was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the public support of the Daejeon District Court on November 3, 2006 and was sentenced to three times more.

From December 2012, the Defendants, using cargo vehicles, stolen electric wires together, cut off approximately 100 km of 80,000 won electric wires from the market price of the damaged company, which is the owner of the damage company installed at the distribution and publicity of the transmission line, to cut off them into the factory, and loaded them into the D1 ton and loaded them over three occasions from that time to February 1, 2013, as shown in the attached list of crimes, and combine them with three times more than 10,840,203 won in total at the market price of the victims owned by the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement of E, F and G;

1. Photographs;

1. The photograph of the damaged site and the budget bill for power distribution works;

1. Previous records of judgment: A written inquiry of criminal records, etc., a copy of the judgment rendered by Cheongju District Court Decision 2002No 335 (A), a copy of the judgment rendered by 2005Kadan1193 (A), Daejeon District Court Decision 2005No2695 (A), and a copy of the judgment rendered by 206 Goju24 (B) from Daejeon District Court Decision 2006 Goju-Ma224 (B);

1. Habituality of the judgment: Application of the statutes to the thief is recognized in view of the defendants' criminal records, method of crime, frequency of crime, and the fact that the same kind of crime was repeated several times in a planned manner;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;