logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.19 2016고정4011
집회및시위에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who acts as the chairperson of the Operation Committee of the “E” interest of the Secretary General of the Association.

A person who intends to hold an outdoor assembly or demonstration shall submit a report on it to the head of the competent police station from 720 hours to 48 hours before commencing the outdoor assembly or demonstration.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not report to the head of the competent police station from F 13:30 to 14:25 of the same day, without reporting the head of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Police Station, and used 50 members of the above organization under the name of search, seizure, excessive investigation, visit to the entire E-linenet, etc., and visit to and visit to a press room, etc., under the name of 50 members of the above organization under the pretext of the Act on the Search and Seizure of E-linenets, etc. and Search and Seizure of E-linenets, etc., as well as a banner stating “to stop citizen’s entry and re-rout,” and “to authorize a person who has participated in seizure, i.e., a person who has the right to participate in seizure,” “a person who has participated in seizure,” and “a person who has first been subject to seizure of social facilities, such as a person who has the right to participate in search and seizure,” and “a person who has participated in the E-year search and seizure.”

(A) The author made a statement to the effect that this E is a non-discriminatory and unilateral violence and clearly expresses its intent, and introduced another speaker, along with participants, held an outdoor assembly in such a way as to create an opportunity to “act of a person with a right, i.e., the suppression of a citizen behavior, i., the suppression of a civilian behavior,” and to request an interview with I, and attempt to enter the H.

Accordingly, the Defendant organized an outdoor assembly that was not reported.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The application of any documentary evidence, any documentary CD-related statute;

1. Article 22 (2) and Article 6 (1) of the Act on the elective Assembly and Demonstration against Criminal Facts;

1. Article 70 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

arrow