logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.10.12 2017고단2728
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing car in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, violation of the Road Traffic Act, and violation of the Road Traffic Act;

On April 14, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.079% among blood transfusions on April 14, 2017, and led the Defendant to drive the said car at an influent speed while moving back the front of the road in front of the influence road located in the North Gyeongnam-gun of the Gyeongbuk-gun of the Gyeongbuk-gun of the Gyeongbuk-gun, to the flow of the flow distance (North west-dong) on the right side of the lebal sports.

At the same time, there is a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and negligently driven without driving the car as it is, the street lamps and livestock products owned by lurg group installed on the right side at the time of the Defendant’s running of the car, also received the advertisement board of each market from the Defendant’s back side side of the passenger car.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the Defendant’s injury to the victim C (V, 49 years of age) who was accompanied by the Defendant’s occupational negligence, such as a flusium, which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time damaged the victim’s lurg group’s street lamps worth KRW 2,414,00 in the market price.

2. A person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act shall not operate a motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance. However, the Defendant operated a B rocketing motor vehicle at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, which is not covered by mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. A letter of general diagnosis;

1. Inquiry into the mandatory insurance;

arrow