1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. All of the plaintiffs' claims added in the trial are dismissed.

3...

1. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the E-si factory site 1,656С (hereinafter “instant factory site”) and the stringer’s stringer’s stringer’s ice 24m2.24m2 (hereinafter “instant factory”). Plaintiff B is operating the instant plant with the trade name “F” in the said plant. The Defendant C is the actual owner of the 3,957m2 and 423m22m2 (hereinafter “each of the instant farmland”) adjacent to the instant factory site in Yangju-si, Yangju-si, who exercised his right on each of the instant lands, and Defendant D is a person who was entrusted with the name on the registry with respect to each of the instant farmland in this case by Defendant C.

B. From May 2010 to July 2010, Defendant C, in order to establish access roads to each of the instant farmland, performed 600 meters away from the natural ditches located on the J (hereinafter “J”) of Yangju-si (hereinafter “J”) to fill the ground. On the other hand, each of the instant farmland, which was filled up on each of the instant farmland, was constructed as a single shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-son, installed an artificial road (hereinafter “the instant artificial road”) in each of the instant farmland and Yangju-si I (hereinafter “I”) to make it a new waterway removal.

C. From August 16, 2010 after Defendant C performed the above work, each of the farmland in this case and the factory site in this case were laid down to the front, and the rainwater, which was laid down to the above I, through the artificial waterway in this case, rainwater, which was laid down on each of the farmland in this case, is the instant waterway.