Plaintiff and appellant
Plaintiff
Defendant, Appellant
Defendant
Conclusion of Pleadings
September 7, 2006
The first instance judgment
Suwon District Court Decision 2005Kadan14892 decided Nov. 22, 2005
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the defendant ordered the plaintiff to issue an order to the building listed in the attached list and to pay 600,000 won per month from the day after the delivery of the complaint of this case to the day after the completion of the above order for the name of the building.
Reasons
The reasoning of this court's explanation on this case is as follows: "(In this case, according to the statement No. 3-2 of the certificate No. 3-2, it is recognized that the reason for this case's multi-household house in the column of the cause and other matters in the title section of the registry of the multi-household house in this case, "It is transferred from the Dong, Dong, Dong, Dong, Gyeonggi-do, due to division." Since another agricultural cooperative, a mortgagee, can confirm the fact that the multi-household house in this case was changed from the multi-household house to the multi-household house at the time of acquiring the above right to collateral security, it can be confirmed on the registry that the multi-household house in this case could have been registered as a person who has an address or residence in the multi-household house in this case, it is identical to the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of "the possibility of existence of a person who
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.
[Attachment Omission of List of Real Estate]
Judges Lee Jae-chul (Presiding Judge) (Presiding Justice)