The judgment below

Part 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 25 of the attached list at the time of the original adjudication.

1. The decision of the court of final appeal shall be made ex officio.

In a case where an act of infringement of trademark rights under Article 93 of the Trademark Act was continued with respect to several registered trademarks, one crime is established by combining each trademark right holder and each other. Thus, barring any special circumstance, it cannot be deemed that one crime is established by combining several acts of infringement of trademark rights different from the trademark right holder and each other on the ground that the trademark

(See Supreme Court Decision 2009Do10759 Decided July 14, 201). According to the aforementioned legal doctrine, the registered trademark service mark (No. 1060; hereinafter “instant registered trademark 1”) composed of “Titts and sports airts, etc. as designated goods, among the facts charged of the instant case, is subject to the infringement of the trademark registration number No. 6, 8, 13, 16, 17, 19 (hereinafter “the first registered trademark infringement part”) and the trademark registration number (No. 3605; hereinafter “2 registered trademark of this case”) composed of “Titts and sports airts” as designated goods, and the list No. 4, 7, 9, 10, 12, 18, and 25 (hereinafter “No. 166 registered trademark of this case”) composed of the above list No. 4, 209 through No. 3605; hereinafter “No. 36, 25, etc. of the instant registered trademark of this case”).