The judgment below

Part 3 through 10, 12, 13, 16 through 19, and 25 of the attached list shall be reversed.

. against the Defendant.

1. Scope of the judgment of this court;

A. (1) The summary of the facts charged in the instant case and the number of crimes are as follows: (a) the trademark right was infringed by keeping the goods identical or similar to the registered trademark of the trademark right holder in order to sell them; (b) the list No. 6, 8, 13, 16, 17, and 19 of the attached Table No. 6, 8, 16, 19 (hereinafter “the first registered trademark infringement part”); (c) the trademark service mark (registration No. 3605; hereinafter “No. 2 of the instant registered trademark”) composed of “No. 4,5,79, 10, 12, 18, and 25 (hereinafter “No. 2 of the instant registered trademark”) composed of the registered trademark and service mark No. 2 of “No. 3 of the instant registered trademark” (hereinafter “No. 2 of the instant case”); and (d) the list No. 1 through No. 5 of the designated goods “No. 16 of the instant registered trademark (hereinafter “No. 2 of the instant case”).

Where an act of infringement of trademark rights under Article 93 of the Trademark Act has continued to be committed with respect to several registered trademarks, an act of infringement of trademark rights under Article 93 of the Trademark Act is constituted by a single crime, and there are several trademark rights different from each registered trademark on the ground that the trademark right holder and the mark