The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The grounds for appeal by the defendant are too heavy.

The fact that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case, and appears to have endeavored to recover damage after the crime, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

The defendant has obtained a large amount of money by deceiving a large number of victims and has a high possibility of criticism, and the crime of fraud by Internet sales, such as each of the crimes of this case, damages the order of electronic commerce, promotes the e-commerce to the society as a whole, and promotes a large number of victims, so strict punishment corresponding thereto is necessary, and there are the same criminal records, etc. that are disadvantageous to the defendant.

In addition, comprehensively taking into account the following factors: the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, occupation, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court cannot be deemed to be unfair because the sentence imposed by the Defendant is too unreasonable.

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.