All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence declared by the prosecutor by the court below is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The criminal conduct of selling secondhand goods on the Internet needs to be strictly punished by impairing the sound order of electronic commerce and encouraging a e-commerce in society as a whole. In light of the form, method and period of each of the crimes of this case, the number of times and frequency of each of the crimes of this case, the nature of the crime and the liability for the crime is very heavy, and the defendant continues to repeat the above fraud even while he is under investigation by the police due to the fraud of selling goods on the Internet, and the considerable part of the amount of damage has not been recovered, etc. are disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, all of the crimes of this case are recognized by the defendant, and his mistake is divided, half of the amount of damage was paid in the court below, agreed with some victims, and the damage was paid to five additional victims, and there was no record of punishment heavier than the fine, which is favorable to the defendant.

In addition, considering the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and all of the sentencing conditions mentioned in the records and arguments in this case, such as the situation after the crime, it is not deemed unfair because the sentence imposed by the court below is too heavy or unfasible.

Therefore, each of the above arguments by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.