logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.10.07 2014고정661
사문서위조등
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged in this case

A. A. On September 7, 2010, the Defendant: (a) drafted the above loan certificate forgery and event using a black paper on the loan certificate paper prepared in advance by a female under the name-free female prepared by the above company’s accounting officer at the time without C’s permission at the office for development of land investment in the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Geum-ro, 62-17, the third floor of the building; and (b) written the above loan certificate by stating “C” in the amount column, “C” in the creditor number column, “D” in the resident number column, “C” in the resident number column, and “F (Korea Bank)” in the deposit account column; and (c) signed the Defendant’s unmanned seal on the side of “C” side of the above date and at the above time and place, it seems that the above false loan certificate was a document duly formed with the above forged loan certificate to a female under the name-free female.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged and exercised one copy of the loan certificate in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. Around September 7, 2010, the Defendant: (a) drafted a land sales contract in the column for indicating real estate at the land investment development office in the above state of (B) land in the manner described above, such as “YY,” “YYY,” “YYY,” “YYY E,” and “C” in the buyer’s name column; (b) affixed the Defendant’s seal on the side of “C”; and (c) sent the Defendant’s seal to the above-mentioned female under the name of the above-mentioned female who is aware of the forgery at the above time and place, as if it was a document duly formed with the completion of the forged land sales contract. Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of the land sales contract in the name of the private document related to rights and obligations, and exercised it. (2) On December 13, 2010, the Defendant, at the above state-owned land development office at the time of the above state-owned land development, has prepared for the above method as above, “YYYYYYYYYYYYYYY,”.

arrow