logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.10.11 2018구단63030
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. On October 13, 2017, the Defendant’s disposition of non-approval for medical care rendered to the Plaintiff on the part of October 13, 2017, such as “refluent reconction of the visiting officer” and “comfore.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 16, 2017, while the Plaintiff was engaged in the installation and operation of electric equipment to the employees belonging to the Daewoo Shipbuilding Marine Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the treatment shipbuilding sea”), the Plaintiff went to the hospital on May 16, 2017. At this point, the Plaintiff was diagnosed at a certain point as “the instant injury and disease” (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”), and applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant.

B. The Defendant’s original disposition body was a specialist’s opinion that “Isteinitis among the injury and disease in the instant case is the main injury and that Istein stein stein stein stein and stein stein stein stein stein stein stein stein stein in the process of performing an operation,” and that “Istein stein stein stein is not known as the cause itself is unclear or as a result of the work, and thus, there is no proximate causal relation with the work of the instant injury and disease

C. The Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but was ruled to dismiss the request for reexamination by the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee.

[Grounds for recognition] The descriptions of evidence Nos. 3 and 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff used his arms and shoulder within 7-8 hours a day on average in the course of performing the installation and operation of electric equipment for the 19-year period after he entered the Daewoo Shipbuilding's Ocean. The plaintiff was in charge of additional duties during weekends and vacations. The plaintiff did not receive any pain or king for his shoulder or arms before he entered the Daewoo Shipbuilding's marine area. The plaintiff received 3-day pain treatment due to herogrosis, rherogrosis, and rherogrosis for the recent 8-year period, and therefore, the plaintiff continued excessive shouldering and salting after his job.

arrow