logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.11.22 2018고단3232
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the above fine is not paid, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on September 14, 2018 on the ground that, at around 18:48, the Seoul Gwangjin Police Station’s ground parking lot located in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, for drinking alcohol and the investigation into the suspicion of traffic accidents, the Defendant demanded a tobacco to the police officer B of the above police station, who was try to move from the patrol car to the police officer B of the police station, along with C for a traffic accident investigation to the police officer assigned to the police officer of the above police station B of the police station, on the ground that he did not take it, but did not take it.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on traffic accident investigation.

"2018 Highest 3433"

1. Around September 18:26, 2018, the Defendant driven a Maz car with approximately 700 meters alcohol concentration at approximately 0.132% while under the influence of alcohol at around September 18, 2018 from the roads in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City to the roads in front of the same Gu E-mail.

2. The Defendant is a person who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from dangerous driving) and is engaged in driving a FM car.

On September 8, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.132% during blood transfusions on September 18, 2018, and proceeded one lane from five lanes in front of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City E-do to about 60km in the direction of the military direction in the direction of the military.

At the time, there was a lot of traffic volume due to the time of retirement, so in such cases, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely, such as making a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle to live well, accurately manipulating the steering direction, brakes, etc., while driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received the back portion of the victim G(33) bicycle riding prior to the right side of the car on the part of the Defendant’s driving due to negligence in the course of his duties, which led to the Defendant’s negligence of neglecting the driving due to drinking.

Ultimately, the defendant is driving normally due to the influence of drinking.

arrow