logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.08.12 2016고합74
공직선거법위반등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Defendant

B Fine of 5,00,000 won, Defendant C and D shall be fine of 2,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

I. Basic facts are H private taxi engineers residing in G in Kim Jong-si, and Defendant B is a person who operates the “I” beauty room in the above residence and is a party member A with interest of J party members.

Defendant

C is a private taxi engineer in K, and Defendant D is a private taxi engineer in L.

Victim M(the remaining, the age of 63) is a candidate for the election district P political party in the 20th National Assembly member's election district held on April 13, 2016, and Q is a candidate for the same election district J party.

Ⅱ Criminal facts

1. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants [Violation of the Public Official Election Act by a third party contribution act];

(a) No one shall make, or have another make contributions to, a candidate or political party to which he belongs in connection with an election;

Nevertheless, Defendant B’s advance polling (around April 8, 2016, Q and J parties (hereinafter “P”) sent to the 20th National Assembly member’s electoral constituency, which was held on April 13, 2016, to unspecified customers from early April 2016.

4. In addition to the invitation of the advance polling station, Defendant A notified Defendant A of the scheduled fact, etc. to provide convenience in taxi transport free of charge until the advance polling station. While Defendant A asked the aforementioned voters to provide convenience in taxi transport free of charge, Defendant C and Defendant D, who is the seat of Defendant C and Defendant D, waiting in the above “I” beauty room, and asked the above voters to provide convenience in taxi transport free of charge for Qua. Defendant C and Defendant D provided a request to provide convenience in taxi transport free of charge to the above voters. Defendant C and Defendant D continued to gather convenience in taxi transport free of charge until the advance polling station for Q Q Q.

B. The Defendant A’s specific act of implementation had arrived at R by operating H personal taxi around April 8, 2016 according to the aforementioned public offering, and at that place, the said public offering was made from Defendant B in advance.

arrow