(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.11.27 2015고단3159

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.11.27 2015고단3159

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 3159] On May 30, 2015, the Defendant, in collusion with C, posted an article that victim F will purchase the Kamera fropo, on the Internet Nurier's Middleest Kamera, in collusion with C, and told the victim to contact with the victim to send the Kamera fropo, which wants to purchase 2.50,000 won on the face of the State.

However, the defendant and C did not have any intention or ability to send the purchased goods as they promised to receive money from the victim.

In collusion with C, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 250,00 from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of G on the same day as the price for the above goods, and received KRW 250,000 from around that time to September 1, 2015 by receiving KRW 4,413,00 in total as shown in attached crime list 1, from around 36 times.

[2015 Highest 3425] On September 9, 2015, the Defendant reported the victim H's writing that he/she would want to purchase a credit cooperative for home use in the middleest Kabufa, and made a false statement that he/she would contact the victim to sell the credit cooperative in KRW 30,00.

However, even if the defendant received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to send the credit cooperative for home use.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 30,00 from the victim to the Defendant’s national bank account on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

[2015 Highest 3676] On August 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) visited the Internet NAVVER in the PC room located in Suwon-si; (b) reported that the victim I sent a notice to purchase the Blux Tech; and (c) confirmed that I would immediately send the goods after checking the deposit amount.

However, even if the defendant receives the price from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above goods.

Nevertheless, there is a need to do so.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2016.10.28 2016고단832

-대전지방법원 2015.10.23 2015고단1799

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2015.03.25 2014고단670

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.04.15 2014고단2406

-대전지방법원 2016.09.01 2016고정660