A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 23, 2016, from around 01:35 to around 01:55, the Defendant demanded that the victim C (here, 38 years of age) located in Ansan-si B pay alcohol to the victim, but prior to that time, the victim who memorys the failure at his/her home was unable to sell alcohol, and thus, obstructed the victim’s main store business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as: (a) the victim’s breath of drinking at his/her home; (b) the victim’s breath of drinking at his/her home; and (c) the victim’s breath of drinking; and (d) the victim’s breath of drinking at his/her home; and (d) the victim’s 20 minutes of drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of C’s written law to the victim;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order [Scope of sentencing guidelines] - No person who has basic area of Class 1 (Interference with Business) (6 months to one year and six months): - No person subject to special sentencing [decision of sentence] - The defendant acknowledges his/her mistake and reflects his/her wrong: The defendant's unfavorable circumstances: the defendant has a record of having been punished several times for the same type of crime, such as suspension of execution due to a crime of interference with business in 2007, obstruction of business in 2011, interference with business in 2015, suspension of execution due to a crime of interference with business in 207, suspension of execution due to a crime of interference with business in 207, and failure to agree with the