The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (2,00,000 won) on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant appears to be against the Defendant’s recognition of the instant crime, the instant crime was committed by force to destroy the victim’s property and interfere with his duties, such as the cryp and disinfection of the cryp and disinfection equipment, etc. solely on the ground that the Defendant did not promptly bring about alcohol. However, the instant crime was committed by force, such as the cryp and disinfection of the victim, the cryp and disinfection of the cryp, and the cryp, etc. was committed. As such, the nature of the instant crime is not good

Although the Defendant had been sentenced to a fine 17 times and two times of punishment, the Defendant committed the instant crime without being weighted, and at the same time, committed the instant crime. In full view of the aforementioned circumstances and all other circumstances revealed in the pleadings of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the instant crime, means and consequence, etc., the Defendant cannot be deemed as unfair due to excessive punishment imposed by the lower court.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.