(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.02.12 2013고정1817

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.02.12 2013고정1817

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is in a position of adviser of B Co., Ltd. and plays a role of introducing construction to the above company.

1. On August 27, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at the office of the E company office of the victim D operation in Jung-gu Government-si, “B may receive from the victim the part of the remodeling construction work for the Incheon G, which is being conducted in the Note F, the cost of which is KRW 1 million, as it is possible for the victim to know well the chairperson or the president of several companies as the adviser B corporation, and which can be performed at any time.”

However, the above commercial buildings at the time did not proceed with the remodeling construction itself due to the shortage of funds, so even if receiving money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to allow the victim to receive the said electrical construction.

On the same day, the Defendant was transferred KRW 1 million to the Defendant’s post office account under the pretext of intermediary expenses for contracting the commercial electrical construction on the same day.

2. On September 6, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the “J” office used by the “J” office in the “J” office in the fiveth floor of the G award in Incheon H, and that “The case should be changed to the other party of the I company, who made efforts to have the contract become a sex because the contract was a sexually formed.”

However, there was no fact that the victim entered into a subcontract contract so that it can do electrical construction in G commercial building.

The Defendant received 2 million won from the victim to the above post office account under the pretext of case expenses.

3. Around September 8, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “The victim demanded additional expenses from the I company to be incurred in KRW 500,000,000” to the E company office operated by the victim.

However, the fact that GJ did not give the victim an order for electrical construction as above.

The defendant shall be 50,000 won from the victim to the post office account on the same day.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.02.28 2017고단5282

-대전지방법원논산지원 2020.10.06 2020고단399

-청주지방법원 충주지원 2020.06.05 2018고단606

-서울서부지방법원 2015.05.19 2014고단1001

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2013.10.24 2013고단320