A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. The facts are that the Defendant received orders for removal of brick factories owned by the Defendant at the time of the original site due to the lack of an intention or ability to subcontract the works related to the removal works to others. However, on August 24, 2008, the Defendant ordered the victim H to remove brick factories at the construction site of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the

2. The facts revealed that the Defendant was running a construction business in the position of the president of the Incheon District of Incheon (hereinafter “I”) around November 201, but only used the name of I and there was no intention or ability to take over another construction company directly. The Defendant did not have the intention or ability to take over another construction company, and even though there was no intention or ability to take over the remaining transport right related to the civil engineering works since the Defendant was to take over the construction works executed in the river, the Defendant, at his own office located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul High Court, Geumcheon-gu Seoul High Court around November 17, 201, ordered the victim K to take over the transportation right of the remaining transport right of the Korea Construction Corporation for the Korea Construction Corporation under the name of the Korea Construction Corporation in the name of Korea. Accordingly, the Defendant took over the remaining transport right of the Korea Construction Corporation as a down payment from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to K and H;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act are applicable;