The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (the imprisonment of eight months and the collection of 100,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. The determination that the Defendant contributed to the prevention of accidents in the detention house by actively providing relief, such as the confession of the instant crime and the fact that the Defendant is against the Defendant’s confession, the fact that the Defendant was only once a philopon simple one-time medication, the discovery of other prisoners in an emergency situation during the confinement, and the implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, etc., may be considered as sentencing materials favorable to the Defendant.

However, in light of the fact that the Defendant had been punished for the same crime nine times, and that the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of having been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, and constitutes a repeated crime, and that in light of the criminal history and the result of the appraisal of maternity, etc., the Defendant seems to have already been addicted to phiphones, and that there is a high need to isolate the Defendant from society among society, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, family relationship, etc., even if considering the favorable circumstances mentioned above, the sentence of the lower court is not heavy.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.