(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.07.12 2017고단1630

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.07.12 2017고단1630

업무방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Around 17:00 on January 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was divingd without placing an order for food at a decentralization operated by the victim D (the 64 years of age) who was in the Gu, Jindo-si, Jindo-si (hereinafter “Ado-si”); (b) the victim was able to see that “Ido-be in the house so that I will get customers,” and (c) the victim was able to see that “Is-be in several times or house, Is-be in the same dog, Is-be in the same dog, Is-be in the opening”; and (d) the victim was able to see that “Is-be in the middle, Is-be, Is-be, Is-be, Is-be, Is-be, Is-be in the middle, after going back to the floor, and that Is-be in the middle, Is-be.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's business of the divided food store by force.

2. Around 18:30 on January 9, 2017, the Defendant, at the place indicated in paragraph (1), and as described in paragraph (1), 112 reported that the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business, the victim G, a police police box affiliated with the F police box called out, took a bath over several occasions, such as “a sprinke sprinke, a sprinke,” and “a sprinke, a sponse,” in which the victim’s 10 persons, including E as described in paragraph (1), were sprinked, and had customers, etc. around the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made in relation to D, E, and G;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant had mental and physical weakness by taking over the drugs of stability, exemption, etc. at the time of each of the crimes of this case. However, in light of the circumstances, contents and methods of each of the above crimes which can be duly adopted and examined by the court, the defendant's ability to distinguish things at the time of each of the crimes of this case, in light of the defendant's behavior and circumstances before and after, and after, the defendant's aforementioned crimes.

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2016.08.10 2016고정291

-울산지방법원 2016.02.11 2015고정1282

-부산지방법원 2018.01.24 2017고정2004

-서울동부지방법원 2016.05.27 2016고단86

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.03.22 2017고단3550