1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s first refusal to resign and filing a petition 1) The Plaintiff’s period of service around January 2010 is from March 1, 2010 to February 29, 2012, established and operated by the Defendant’s C University (hereinafter “Defendant University”).

Article 6 of the “Agreement on the Employment of Teachers” prepared between the Plaintiff and the president of the Defendant University. At the time, the Defendant University informed the Plaintiff of the expiration of the term of appointment and relevant procedures on October 201, 201, that “The research performance and educational service performance set out in the Regulations on the Personnel Management of C University and the Regulations on the Comprehensive Evaluation of Teachers during the Contract Period shall be met, and that the Defendant University shall be judged eligible for the evaluation of teachers shall be determined based on the evaluation of teachers.”

However, the defendant university suspended the review of reappointment and conducted an investigation into whether the plaintiff's research misconduct, etc., as information pointing out some of the articles prepared by the plaintiff in the clothing department, etc. on the 12th day of the same year.

3) As a result of conducting a preliminary investigation and a full-scale investigation on the total 33 copies of the Plaintiff’s thesis reported at the time of the Research Promotion Committee under the Defendant University’s University, with the consent of all eight members of the full-scale investigation committee around February 2012 (nine members of the full-scale investigation committee), it was determined that research misconduct, etc. was committed in Part 5 as described below (hereinafter “the pertinent thesis individually referred to as “1” and “each thesis of this case” if each of the above papers is referred to as “each thesis of this case”.

2) As to the issue of the publication year of the author’s publication, 1D A EF G 201 M 201 M J 2007 research misconduct (Alteration) 3 K A L 2007 paper publication overlap 4 N AO P 2005 paper and duplicate publication 5 Q AO 2010 paper 4) the Plaintiff re-examine the above research result.