logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.11.12 2018가단139668
청구이의
Text

1. The Defendant’s decision on recommendations for performance in the Daegu District Court 2018Gaso24108 Claims against the Plaintiff was based on the decision on recommendations for performance.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with the intent to compensate for damages incurred in relation to the operation of the C Excavation Aircraft owned by B (hereinafter “instant digging aircraft”). The Defendant is in a relationship with the insurer under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act with a special corporation established under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act and entrusted by the Minister of Employment and Labor with the industrial accident compensation insurance business (hereinafter “D”).

B. On November 1, 2015, E, a worker of D (hereinafter referred to as “victim”) suffered injury, such as “Irre the string of the body part of the body of the victim and the body, and the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the instant string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the 2015, while the string of the string of the string of the 2015, using the string of the string of the string of the string of the 2015, the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

The victim was hospitalized for 190 days due to the instant accident and received medical treatment for 145 days, and the Defendant paid 59,282,490 won in total, including medical care benefits 29,767,130 won, temporary disability compensation benefits 23,894,360 won, disability lump sum 5,621,00 won, and disability lump sum 5,282,490 won.

The Defendant filed a lawsuit seeking reimbursement of KRW 29,511,078, which deducts 40% of the fault of the victim, among the insurance proceeds paid by the Defendant to the victim under the Daegu District Court 2018Gaso24108, on the ground that there was negligence in G driving the instant excavation equipment in the occurrence of the instant accident, as to the Plaintiff, the insurer of the instant excavation equipment, as the Daegu District Court 2018Gaso24108, the Defendant brought a lawsuit claiming reimbursement of KRW 29,51,078, which was the sum of KRW 19,418,00,00,000, including the total of KRW 19,418,00,00 for temporary shutdown damage during the duration of hospitalization, and the said court from November 30, 2016 to the Defendant.

arrow