logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2013.10.23 2013고단193
상해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 16:15, at the early stage of the Victim B (the age of 61) located in Seocho-si E Apartment 105 Dong 1002 (the age of 61) on Apr. 27, 2013, the Defendant sent the victim’s face to the large interest in drinking water; (b) taken the victim’s face from drinking water; and (c) took the victim’s hand over the floor by pushing the victim.

As a result, the defendant injured the victim about two weeks of treatment, such as snow grass and open wound around snow.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph 1, the victim A (the age of 31) brought the victim’s bath while being blicked, he saw the victim’s face once by hand, and blicked the victim’s blick, and blicked the victim’s face by hand, and blicked the victim’s blick, once the victim’s face.

As a result, the Defendant brought about multiple gambling cases requiring treatment for about two weeks to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement and part of Defendant B’s legal statement

1. A’s legal statement;

1. On-site and photographs of damaged parts;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. The defendant B and his defense counsel's assertion as to the defendant B and the defendant Eul of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Korea Criminal Procedure Act of the Korea Criminal Procedure of the Korea Criminal Procedure Act of the Korea Criminal Procedure of this case are merely resisting the defendant's attack against the defendant Eul, and such act constitutes a legitimate act or self-defense. However, according to the evidence mentioned above, the defendant B's face over the passive resistance or an unlawful attack against the defendant Eul's defense against the defendant Eul can be acknowledged as a harmful act such as making several times of face of the defendant Eul by hand. Thus, the above defendant's assertion as

arrow