beta
Text
Defendant
A is punished by imprisonment with prison labor for each other than fraud against N, for three years, and fraud against N.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A on November 23, 2012, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced five years of suspension of execution to three years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), etc. on September 12, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 12, 2013. On October 18, 2014, Defendant C was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court and became final and conclusive on April 9, 2015.
Defendant A is the actual operator of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and Defendant B is the representative director of the PP in charge of the sale and purchase of each real estate.
1. On May 2013, the Defendants, at the first floor coffee shop in Busan, stated that “The Defendants are working for the victim Q Q, which is in need of operating funds. If 150 million won is lent, the Defendants would pay 200 million won including interest after three months.”
However, at the time, the above SP was already awarded a successful bid in other companies and the defendants could not purchase them. Rather, around January 2, 2013, the defendants borrowed 550 million won from U, etc. in the process of purchasing Daegu-gu TP, and the monthly community credit cooperatives borrowed 500 million won in the name of each company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company.
Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim, thereby deceiving the victim, to the corporate bank account in the name of the Defendant A on May 29, 2013.