1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) On December 31, 2012, the Plaintiff’s title on December 31, 2012 (hereinafter “instant patent application invention”) is an invention “the creation of a glue glue glue glue glue glue glue glue glue glue glu

(2) On January 23, 2014, an examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office notified the Plaintiff that “the invention of this case cannot obtain a patent due to the lack of non-obviousness.” However, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office amended the specification, etc. on June 23, 2014, but the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office rejected the Plaintiff’s request on October 30, 2014 to the effect that “the invention of this case is not patentable due to the denial of non-obviousness by the prior invention 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8” (the Plaintiff’s request for a trial on December 1, 2014, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office rejected the Plaintiff’s request for a new trial on the ground that “the instant patent invention of this case was rejected by the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office 1, 7, 8, 1, and 205” on December 30, 2014.

B. The name of the invention claimed in the instant patent application invention (as amended on March 30, 2015, No. B, No. 1): The composition of a luxal lux and a luxal luxal luxal lux in which the luxal and luxal lux were improved.