1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 27, 2014, the Plaintiff presented a notice to the effect that, among the original invention filed in Korea by the number 10-208-708-1297, the patent application of this case was “the manufacturing method of fludine fludine.” However, on August 5, 2014, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office presented a notice to the effect that “the claim 1 of the patent application of this case can be easily patented by applying multiple fire extinguishing reactions publicly known to fludine 2 in the prior invention, so patent cannot be granted,” and that the Plaintiff’s submission of the written opinion to the effect that “the response to the claim 1 of this case can be reduced to fludine fludemine fludemine fludemine fludemine fludemine fludemine flusium flusium fludem flusium 2 and the amendment of this case.”

However, despite the aforementioned amendments and written opinions on July 1, 2015, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office decided to refuse the registration of the patent for the invention of this case on the ground that “the nonobviousness 1 of the patent application invention of this case is denied by combining the cited invention 1 and 2, thereby not being patentable.”

3. Accordingly, on August 3, 2015, the Plaintiff as the Intellectual Property Tribunal No. 2015 Won45.