logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.02 2016가단5222708
구상금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 70,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from April 9, 2015 to September 1, 2017, and the following.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a special corporation established pursuant to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”) and entrusted by the Minister of Employment and Labor with the business of industrial accident compensation insurance, and the Gyeonggi-do Housing Bank Co., Ltd. is a subscriber of industrial accident compensation insurance under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act and the owner of A bus (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

The defendant is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a mutual aid agreement with the Gyeonggi-do Housing Bank bus for the instant vehicle.

B. At around 20:20 on October 7, 2013, B, who is a driver of the Gyeonggi-do Housing Co., Ltd., was driving the instant vehicle, and was placed in the garage of the Gyeonggi-do Co., Ltd., which is located in the Simcheon-si, for parking, and did not find a worker C belonging to the Gyeonggi Housing Co., Ltd., which was set up in the direction of the progress of the instant vehicle, and did not look at the direction of the operation of the instant vehicle to the right-hand part of the instant vehicle, and shocked C’s head and face part to the left-hand part of the instant vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). C suffered from the instant accident, such as emeral emeral emeral emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric emeric

C. By April 8, 2015, the Plaintiff paid C temporary layoff benefits amounting to KRW 34,289,640, medical care benefits amounting to KRW 95,295,650, disability benefits amounting to KRW 105,447,660, pursuant to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 through 7, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence and scope of liability for damages;

A. The above recognition of the liability for damages and the following circumstances recognized by each of the above evidence, namely, the instant accident, was found in the garage at the time when the route buses affiliated with the Gyeonggi-Faeabbabababababababababbabababbabba, completed the operation of the garage, and became a driver of the Gyeonggi-Babababbabababababab,

arrow