logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.08.24 2015가단14884
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 243,754,98 for the Plaintiff and the following: 5% per annum from October 7, 2013 to August 24, 2016.

Reasons

1. Establishment of liability for damages;

A. The fact-finding B is an operator of the bus C (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) who is an employee of the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) and is engaged in driving service of the bus C (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

B around 20:20 on October 7, 2013, while driving the instant vehicle and converting the direction of the progress of the instant vehicle into the right side for parking on the garage of the Defendant company located within the city of Macheon-si, the Plaintiff was not found and the head and face part of the instant vehicle was shocked by the left side part of the instant vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident.” The Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as cerebral mathal mathal mathal mathal mathal mathal mathal mathal mathal, and mathal mathal mathal mathal mathal, and

At the time of the accident, the above garage was difficult, and there was no boundary between India and the roadway.

At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff completed bus operation as a bus driver belonging to the Defendant Company, and was in the length of returning home after parking the operating vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 3's evidence 12, 4, 8's evidence 1-3, 67, Eul evidence 3-12, witness D and Eul's testimony and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. In full view of the facts acknowledged as one liability and the purport of the entire pleadings, we can see the following circumstances:

① The Plaintiff is a dong car driver of the Defendant Company, and the location of the accident is a garage where the bus of the Defendant Company is located, and the time of the accident is the operation of the route bus belonging to the Defendant Company after completing the operation on the day, and if the Defendant Company’s driver is employed on the garage, it would have been sufficiently predicted that other drivers who have completed the operation within the garage and walked.

(2) In general, buses shall have a large radius, and a blind spot shall be wide.

arrow